There must have been a time (I can, after
all remember it) when listening to Philip Glass was not a guilty sin. Even in the generally dismissed world of
Minimalist Music he was regarded as a pioneer and someone to be respected as a
classical composer.
I say this because, having recently bought
a new Naxos disc of his music including “Light” and the “Heroes Symphony” I
think that he has descended to level of Muzak.
This reaction might come as a direct result
of my experience of “Le Grand Macabre” on Tuesday. Arriving in Barcelona at a reasonable hour,
some two and a half hours before the start of the performance, I filled the time
by dividing it by visiting El Corte Ingles and failing to find a reasonable
restaurant to while away the spare minutes.
El Corte Ingles again offered me the
tempting prospect of boxed sets of extremely desirable discs at almost give away
prices. Unfortunately, even at “give
away” prices the number of discs in each box meant that the total was quite
high.
In an uncharacteristic act of self-denial,
I resorted to my sci-fi book technique of limiting purchases and decided on one
composer and cheap prices and selected the work of Philip Glass and there, at a
unit price which was much higher than the box set offer, but much less in total
was a new disc. I bought it quickly and
left with indecent haste, lest I be tempted by anything more expensive.
I justified the expenditure on a few
grounds: firstly because I have a growing collection of Glass music and I like
it; secondly because Naxos disc are always worth buying and lastly, and most
importantly, so there could be something to look forward to hearing in the car
after staggering out of a performance of Le Grand Macabre if it was as dire as
I expected it to be.
I have been listening to the discs of Ligeti’s
opera religiously in the car to and from work.
I cannot believe there have been many doing their musical “homework” as diligently as I – and failing
signally to get to “know” the work they are listening to so much.
Le Grand Macabre is an unrewarding work to
which to listen and I was relying on the much-vaunted visual effects to make up
for the discordant and frankly messy sounds that accompanied me to work each
morning and speeded my homecoming.
Apart from a brass fanfare-like interlude;
a broken fragment of a string quartet; a chanted chorus which sounded like
people were asking for a beer in Spanish; a cacophony of car horns and a very
short interlude which sounded as though it could have developed into a real
tune – there was not much in this farrago that took my fancy.
The pre-opera meal was in a café/restaurant
on the corner of the block next to the opera house and for my €15 I got two
tapas, some bread with tomato and a glass of fizzy water. My last visit there I think!
The most impressive aspect of the
performance musically was the orchestra who were superb, though I think that
their sheer professionalism sometimes have a more polished sound to elements in
the music which were deliberately (or at least at one time in the past)
intended to be raucous. But the overall
effect was one of intense competence and they had the biggest cheer of all at
the end of the performance.
The second star was the set, the giant
crouching woman on a revolve. During the
course of the performance various parts of this giant figure opened and people
or scenes were revealed. Characters
emerged from nipples, mouth and other parts while thighs opened to reveal sets
within sets. Lights and films played
across the surface of this gigantic figure and the eyes lit up in a comically
disturbing way.
The opera was sung in English, which was an
unexpected bonus, though not all the singers were equally at home in the
language. I assume that Ligeti is not
something that is every opera singer’s cup of tea and it must be a matter of
horses for courses for his operas and I suppose that a lingua franca like
English makes the assembling of a cast that much easier. I imagine that Ligetti singers are rather
like ondes Martenot players: a small group who know each other and meet up
around the world when a performance calls for their skills. I suppose that the ondes Martenot is demanded
in something other than the TurangalĂ®la-Symphonie – but I don’t know of it. And I’m too lazy to look it up!
Yet again at the start of the second half
of the opera, the seats were noticeably more empty than they were before the
performance started – though I suspect that some of the patrons took advantage
of empty seats to improve their view of proceedings!
My favourite singer was the lady who took
the role of Venus and the Head of the Secret Police as she combined a strong,
melodic and resourceful voice with a vibrant stage presence. Otherwise, this is an opera that I will not
be making huge efforts to see again – though having bought the discs I might
well give it the benefit of another change with the images from the stage
performance still clear in my mind.
The next opera is Linda of Chamounix by
Donezetti – and I do have the month of December to get to know it, as the performance
which is the next part of my season ticket is not until January. I am not a great fan of Donezetti – but at
least it will have tunes, ornamented tune possibly, but tunes certainly!
The decision I have to make is which
version I order and listen to. I would
like a version in English, but that probably will not be forthcoming, and I am
not sure what I will gain from one of Donezetti’s opera from hearing the words
in a language I can speak. I fear that
it might be the sort of opera where the melodramatic action might be best
hidden behind the comforting cloak of Italian!
I don’t even know the famous bits in this
opera, so I might start with the highlights and work from there! If there are highlights.
Yesterday I was given on loan “Solar” by Martin
Amis and it turned out to be a jolly, if predictable read. My favourite extract occurred near the start
of the novel when the anti-hero of the story was described as a person for
whom, “The M4 demonstrated a passion for existence which he could not longer
match. He was for the B-road, a cart
track, a footpath.” A delightful
description that the rest of the novel demonstrates both is and also is not
true of the character! This novel should
come with a warning that it is not as determinedly depressing as his work
usually is! I even laughed out loud at
one point!
I have also been given in a more permanent
sense, a selection of three improving and authentically literary books to
keep. I have read all of them, but one
of them, “Rebecca” is in a Folio Society edition with excellent paper, crisp
print and obviously in hardback which is well worth keeping and I am more than
prepared to throw away/give away my paperback version.
“Rebecca” is by far my favourite of Du Maurier’s
novels and the one which repays analysis most profitably. The imagery is dense and deeply
satisfying. It will be a pleasure to
re-read this novel in such a voluptuous edition. Though I don’t like the illustrations! Small point!
No comments:
Post a Comment