Bright sunlight and a gained free period –
who could want more? And getting towards
the weekend.
But wait!
The Day of Shame approaches. A
tedious, mind-bendingly boring meeting scheduled (and actually going to
happen!) on a Saturday morning!
I have confidently been expecting the
meeting to be changed to a Friday evening.
This is a shocking hope, I know, but it just shows how twisted academic
life is here if you can even begin to think of a extended meeting on a Friday
evening after school as some sort of triumph!
But even this sad compromise is not to
be. The meeting has been confirmed for
Saturday. Which is bad. What is worse is the jokingly fatalistic
attitude of my colleagues who even josh each other about how hard done by they
are!
I am, of course, as who would expect
otherwise, totally appalled by the idea and am bitterly and inwardly convulsed
with disgust at the whole concept.
Mindless educational tedium during my weekend! My gorge rises at the mere thought!
However, I will be there. Unsmiling and glowering, but I will be there.
It will be also the last time that I go to
such a meeting. My head of department
will be informed of this at the end of the fiasco. There is another one scheduled for next
year. I will not, emphatically not be there. Let the consequences be what they will!
Things appear to be moving to some sort of
climax as far as the educational world is concerned. The government has discovered that the only
money it can easily save is that which is paid to its workers. There’s a surprise!
Now that we have a right wing government,
it is only a matter of time before our right wing leaders let us know what they
are actually going to do with the power that they have gained. The leader of the right wing party was
particularly carefully to say bugger all about what he might be thinking of
doing as his response to the financial crisis as it begins (!) to engulf the
country as we march relentlessly downhill after feckless, irresponsible Italy.
The first mutterings about financial
savings have been directed towards civil servants. That term has a slightly different meaning in
this country where even some teachers fall into the category. Our school is a foundation (whatever that
means here, I suspect it is merely a way of getting tax exemptions) and our
status is nearest to a grant maintained school in Britain.
Although we charge parents for each child
that crosses into our demesne, the government pays for the teachers in Primary
and Secondary. Why? No idea.
The teachers in the foetal section of the school who teach the Very
Small People and those who teach the equivalent of the Sixth Form are paid for
by the Foundation.
So I have two cheques each month, one from
the Foundation and the other from the Generalitat to reflect the proportions of
my teaching which are respectively in each sector.
Last year the Generalitat cut the money it
gave to the school by 5%, but the school (The Foundation) decided to make up
the money so that no teacher (whatever the proportion of money actually
stopped) had less than s/he had before.
The Generalitat is thinking (has decided)
to cut civil servants (i.e. our, in spite of the fact that we are not proper
civil servants) pay further and it is unlikely that this extra cut will be
ameliorated by the largesse of the Foundation.
I will then have to consider my position,
as I am emphatically not a registered charity.
And certainly not for the benefit of children of the same wealthy parents
who probably helped precipitate the crisis in the first place!
I am truly shocked by how little colleagues
seem to know about what is going to happen to their livelihoods. They have only the haziest notion of how
their salaries are going to be affected by the unfolding political and economic
situation. And if they truly care then
they are managing to hide it well from me!
I bet I am the only person to have approached
the bursar in the school and asked if The Foundation has taken any decisions
about how to approach the possible reductions in pay. I was told that as the governments, both
national and local, have not made any finalized decisions themselves then the
Foundation has not been able to formulate its response. But I was also informed that it would
probably be unlikely that the whole of the cost of the reduction in wages would
be covered by the Foundation itself.
So, with our wages frozen since 2009 and
the year-on-year inflation not being reflected in a pay rise and the prospect
of an actual cut in the salary, I am too depressed to even attempt to calculate
the actual and real percentage drop in the value of the money that I take home
each month!
Hard times indeed. And added to that is the expectation that the
pay freeze will be extended by at least another year!
I am no economist, and cordially loathed
the economic theory that I had to pretend that I had assimilated for my A
Level, but I fail to see how an economy can be stimulated by the punitive
reducing of the wages of a substantial proportion of the working population of
a country. Inflation does not appear to
have been tackled in any meaningful way and everyone can see quite clearly that
prices are rising while the ability to compensate for these increases is being
eroded by diminishing pay.
I will be very interested to see the
figures for the spending during the Christmas period. I know that there is a particular form of
specifically Christmas moral blackmail which prompts parents to spend much more
than they can actually afford, but that is true for each Christmas.
Perhaps there will be a Giffen Good effect
(one of the few economic concepts that stay with me) where it describes the
counter intuitive phenomenon of the rising in the price of a good actually
causing an increase in its demand. I
think that this was first observed with cheap staple goods when the rise in
something like bread for the very poor would mean that they give up other
things to have more of the staple; so they no longer buy meat because they have
limited funds left after the increase in the price of bread so they buy more
bread with the small amount of money that they have left after they have bought
bread because it is not enough to buy a reasonable amount of meat.
And that explanation probably demonstrates
in as clear a way as possible the reason that I didn’t pursue economic studies
once the A Level was safely out of the way!
So, according to my analysis parents will
spend more on a festival with a high moral blackmail constant, by spending less
on others with a slightly lower.
A child in Catalonia has three distinct
opportunities for being spoilt in the Christmas period. There is obviously Christmas Day itself, but
in Catalonia it is Christmas Eve which is traditionally the time for presents
to be exchanged. There is also Epiphany
or Kings in early January when a great fuss is made of the arrival of the Three
Kings with parades and sweet throwing and present giving. There is therefore, an opportunity for
parents (if they haven’t already) to amalgamate all three celebrations into one
and make their chosen one more extravagant than the spread of expected
expenditure.
The trick, I suppose, is not to
over-compensate and find yourself paying more on one than you would for the
three. Although the more I think about
it the less like Giffen Goods the whole situation seems to be. So much for my A Level!
The latest news on the governmental cuts to
education is that the government is slightly backtracking. They (or more properly “it”) are talking
about taking away some of the perks that civil servants expect as part of their
jobs, for example, lunch tickets. This
sounds suspiciously like emptying the ashtrays on a 747 to decrease the weight
– and yes, I do know that there is no smoking on flights nowadays and that is
part of the point.
The real expenses in terms of civil
servants are chronic overstaffing, ludicrously generous pensions; free private
health services; general corruption and the job-for-life attitude which
characterizes the life style that functionarios have become accustomed to.
Changing the fundamental and expensive
elements that the government has to tackle is going to cause ructions and
change the face of Spain. If the
government decides to do something about it.
If! Let me emphasise yet again that
although we are classed as some sort of civil servant in the way that we are
funded, we are not classed as the sort of civil servant that is entitled to the
generous financial packages that our more privileged colleagues (some of whom
are teachers, but they have passed professional examinations to gain the title
of functionario) enjoy.
I will wait, without holding my breath, to
listen to the echoes of outraged loss for the targeted group. Am far more likely to hear the rumble of
retreating footsteps from the politicians appalled by the negative howls of
anguish from their affronted employees!
At least I hope so, because their cause will become ours.
It looks more and more likely that the
notorious “extra” pays will be the target for the government. The idea that there will be 14 payments
during the year does not mean that there are any extras there. It is just the fact that two tranches of
money which you have earned are not paid to you in monthly instalments. And now they are under attack. If, of course they had been integrated into
the normal monthly salary then they would not have been able to pick it off so
easily.
The “plans” are not fully formulated and
therefore there is still hope before the money is “untim’ly ripped” from our
less than inspiring wage! We teach the
kids that the difference between “wage” and “salary” is that the latter is paid
monthly and the former weekly, but with the amount that I get I do not think
that it qualifies as a professional sum at all and therefore the more homely
term of “wage” seems to fit it better!
The lesson is coming to an end. I have been able to type in it because,
strange to relate, the kids are taking an exam!
Well, there’s a thing!
This is my “early” leave for home so that I
can ponder the fact that, in spite of it being a Friday I still have another
morning of school to look forward to tomorrow.
“Shame!” I hear myself scream. And scream again.
No comments:
Post a Comment